Showing posts with label President Trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label President Trump. Show all posts

Sunday, December 24, 2017

The movement to impeach Trump is just beginning

Trump speaks about the passage of tax reform legislation
The movement to impeach Trump is just beginning

New York Post, Opinion
By Michael Goodwin
November 24, 2017


Before you settle down for a long winter’s nap with adult visions of sugar plums, consider a key fact about the 2018 midterm elections: We already know what they’re going to be about.

Republicans, thanks to their last-minute tax triumph, will run on a pro-growth agenda. If the middle-class tax cuts work as promised, if the economy cooperates by continuing to expand by 3 percent or more and produces jobs, jobs, jobs, the GOP will have a strong message to sell.

It will need one to protect its narrow margins in Congress, especially because the majority party usually loses seats in the first midterms.

Democrats, on the other hand, have no message, no leader and nothing to brag about. That leaves a vacuum, which is being filled with one idea: impeaching President Trump.

Now if an election that pits tax cuts and job growth vs. impeachment strikes you as crazy, don’t blame me. And, truth be told, you can’t really blame Democratic Party leaders either. They aren’t so much leading their base as following it.

The "resistance" wing is taking over the party and congressional bosses Sen. Chuck Schumer and Rep. Nancy Pelosi can either jump on the "Impeach" bandwagon — or get run over by it.

They’re capitulating already, as proven by the way Schumer and others reacted to a rumor last week that the president was going to fire special counsel Robert Mueller.

Never mind that Trump denied it, and there wasn’t even an anonymous source. It was just a rumor started by one House Democrat who said somebody she knew said something about Trump, so she repeated it to the media.

On cue, the Dem lemmings rushed to the microphones and cameras to warn that Trump would face impeachment if he fired Mueller. It was a sneaky way of sounding a dog whistle without a fact to justify it.

In fact, Schumer et al. would be head over heels with joy if Trump did fire Mueller. That would give their impeachment effort gravitas and make it more appealing to independent voters and even some Republicans.

So while they were warning Trump not to fire Mueller, their hope is that he does.

Politically, all this is catnip to the party’s media handmaidens and gives them something to write about instead of the GOP success at passing tax cuts.

Their nonstop chatter, including on the late-night comedy shows, is helping the impeachment madness break the bounds of the loony left and go mainstream.

In line with other recent polls, Quinnipiac’s latest survey reports that Trump’s national approval is just 37 percent, while 50 percent of voters, including 59 percent of women, believe he should resign — and that’s just over the sexual allegations against him.

Among Democrats, Trump’s resignation was favored by a whopping 85–12 percent, while independents favored it by 52–44 percent.

These numbers are off the charts, and they explain the bosses’ emerging strategy. While they’ll decorate the campaign tree with a few other items, like raising taxes on the wealthy and climate-change scares, removing the president will be their main argument for electing a Democratic Congress.

Not incidentally, notice that the sexual allegations against Trump, although they were made before he defeated Hillary Clinton, have replaced Russia, Russia, Russia as the main justification for impeachment. While the Harvey Weinstein-Charlie Rose tsunami is part of the explanation, the other part is that Dems are giving up on Mueller finding anything significant.

Cynic though I am, I never thought the Dems would go down such a low road.

A year ago, when Trump Derangement Syndrome picked up steam after his victory, I assumed it would last six months at most, and there were times when it seemed to be petering out. The "need to impeach" ads by hedge-funder Tom Steyer struck me as a billionaire’s folly.

But I was making the same mistake about the resistance that others had made about Trump’s electability. I assumed it wouldn’t last because nothing like it ever had.

But it’s clear now that the mob-like motivation isn’t going to disappear. It’s become a steamroller force on the left.

No other idea, whether it’s Bernie Sanders’ Free Stuff agenda, or the racial-ethnic-gender quota-spoils dreams of DNC boss Tom Perez, can match the fervor of the hate-Trump movement. It’s the straw stirring the drink.

Which is what makes it so dangerous. Never in modern times has a major party used impeachment as a pure political weapon.

Yet, assuming Mueller comes up with nothing significant, that’s exactly what Democrats are planning. They will try to win with impeachment what they lost at the ballot box, effectively nullifying the 2016 election.

Which brings me to my final prediction: If you think our politics are nasty now, just wait a few months. The midterm campaign is going to be vicious and dirty beyond belief. Read more

Saturday, June 17, 2017

Trump appears to confirm he is being investigated for firing Comey in new 'witch hunt' tweet

President Trump
Trump appears to confirm he is being investigated for firing Comey in new 'witch hunt' tweet
American Bar Association (ABA)
By Debra Cassens Weiss
Posted Jun 16, 2017 09:04 am CDT


Updated: President Donald Trump apparently confirmed he is under investigation for firing FBI director James Comey in an early morning tweet.

The tweet read: "I am being investigated for firing the FBI Director by the man who told me to fire the FBI Director! Witch Hunt."

Trump was likely referring to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, according to several media reports, including stories by the New York Times, the Hill and Politico.

Some commentators, however, said Trump could be referring to special counsel Robert Mueller. Rosenstein appointed Mueller following the recusal of Attorney General Jeff Sessions in the FBI’s probe of Russian influence.

Trump’s tweet could force Rosenstein’s recusal in the Mueller investigation, according to a Bloomberg View article by Harvard law professor Noah Feldman.

If Mueller is investigating Trump’s firing of Comey as possible obstruction of justice, he might want to learn about Trump’s interactions with Rosenstein, the Justice Department official who wrote the memo criticizing Comey’s performance before his firing.

That would mean Rosenstein is a potential witness in the investigation he is overseeing, a point made by Politico in a May 31 article.

Trump’s tweet deepens the potential conflict by asserting that Comey’s firing was Rosenstein’s idea, Feldman says.

If Rosenstein recuses himself, supervision of the Mueller probe would be left to Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand, a Harvard law graduate who clerked for Justice Anthony M. Kennedy and ran the Office of Legal Policy at the Justice Department.

"She’s a horse of a different color from career prosecutors such as Rosenstein, Comey and Mueller," Feldman writes. "Her attitude toward the investigation is likely to be a bit different from Rosenstein’s, more informed by the structure of presidential authority and less by unwritten norms of prosecutorial independence."

The Times points out that Trump’s tweet came hours after an "oddly worded" statement by Rosenstein about leaks.

Rosenstein’s statement read: "Americans should exercise caution before accepting as true any stories attributed to anonymous ‘officials,’ particularly when they do not identify the country—let alone the branch or agency of government—with which the alleged sources supposedly are affiliated."

The Washington Post reported on Wednesday that Mueller is investigating possible obstruction of justice by Trump. According to the Post, both Comey and Daniel Coats, director of national Intelligence, have said Trump sought their help in hopes the FBI would drop the investigation of former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

The Post’s information on Coats is based on anonymous sources who claimed Trump asked Coats whether he could ask Comey to back off the FBI’s focus on Flynn. Coats reportedly said he didn’t feel pressured however.

Comey’s claim was aired in public congressional testimony on June 8. He testified that, about three months before his firing, Trump pressed him to drop the investigation of Flynn by saying he hoped Comey could let it go. Read more
I am being investigated for firing the FBI Director by the man who told me to fire the FBI Director! Witch Hunt
    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump)
June 16, 2017
Updated at 12:25 p.m. to include information from Bloomberg View article and at 12:40 to correct typos.

Wednesday, June 14, 2017

Comey thought leaking memo describing Trump meeting could spur special counsel appointment

Former FBI director James Comey
Comey thought leaking memo describing Trump meeting could spur special counsel appointment
American Bar Association (ABA)
By Debra Cassens Weiss
Posted Jun 08, 2017 01:10 pm CDT


Corrected: Former FBI director James Comey told the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday that he took steps to get his version of a meeting with the president to the news media, believing that doing so might trigger the appointment of a special counsel.

Comey said he wrote memos summarizing his interactions with President Donald Trump because he feared Trump would lie about the nature of the meetings.

In those meetings, Trump asked Comey for loyalty and said he hoped Comey could let go of the investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn’s contacts with Russia, Comey said in prepared testimony for the committee.

After his firing, Comey leaked one of those memos to a Columbia law professor and asked him to share its contents with a reporter, Comey said. Daniel Richman confirmed he was the professor in an email to the Wall Street Journal.

A New York Times story about Trump’s Flynn request, based on the memo, appeared May 16, the New York Times reports.

Comey leaked the memo after his May 9 firing. The Washington Post says Comey’s revelation about his desire for a special counsel was "a remarkable admission showing the degree of concern he had about both Russian interference with U.S. politics, and his doubts about the Justice Department’s ability to probe such activity."

Comey implied in his testimony that any tapes of his conversations with Trump would verify his version of events. "I’ve seen the tweet about tapes. Lordy, I hope there are tapes," he said.

 Comey was referring to a May 12 tweet by Trump that said, "James Comey better hope that there are no ‘tapes’ of our conversations before he starts leaking to the press!" Trump tweeted after a New York Times report that Trump had asked Comey to pledge his loyalty to the president.

After the president tweeted, Comey said, he decided he needed to get the information out in the public square. He asked the law professor to share contents of the memo with a reporter "because I thought that might prompt the appointment of a special counsel," Comey said, according to a "rushed transcript" by the FiveThirtyEight blog.

In his initial statement to the committee, Comey defended the FBI and his leadership of the bureau. Comey said he was confused and concerned about shifting explanations given for his firing.

The Trump administration, he said, chose to defame him and the FBI by asserting the organization was in disarray and the workforce had lost confidence in its leader. "Those were lies, plain and simple," Comey said.

"The FBI is honest, the FBI is strong. And the FBI is and always will be independent," Comey said.

Comey said President Donald Trump gave another explanation for his firing when he told a reporter he was thinking of the "Russia thing" at the time; Comey said he took the president at his word. "It’s my judgment that I was fired because of the Russia investigation," Comey testified. The Associated Press emphasized Comey’s assertion in its coverage.

"I was fired in some way to change, or the endeavor was to change, the way the Russia investigation was being conducted," Comey said.

But when asked if Trump had sought to stop his investigation into Russian interference with the election, Comey said, "Not to my understanding, no."

In his prepared testimony, Comey said Trump told him at a private dinner in January that wanted loyalty from him. "I need loyalty, I expect loyalty," Trump reportedly said.

Comey also said Trump told him during another meeting that Flynn hadn’t done anything wrong in calls with the Russians. "He is a good guy and has been through a lot," Trump reportedly said. "I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go. Read more

Trump told Comey 'I need loyalty,' the fired FBI director says in prepared remarks

Fired FBI director James Comey
Trump told Comey 'I need loyalty,' the fired FBI director says in prepared remarks
American Bar Association (ABA)
By Debra Cassens Weiss
Posted Jun 07, 2017 01:26 pm CDT


Fired FBI director James Comey said in prepared congressional remarks that President Donald Trump told him "I need loyalty, I expect loyalty" during a private dinner in January.

Trump told Comey during another meeting at the Oval Office in February that former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn hadn’t done anything wrong in calls with the Russians, according to Comey’s remarks.

The Washington Post has a report and a link to the testimony (PDF), prepared for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

Comey said in the remarks that he expected other people to be present at the Jan. 27 dinner, but he and Trump were alone. Comey said he was uncomfortable, even before Trump asked for loyalty, so he told the president he was not "reliable" in the way politicians use the word. But he could always be counted on to tell the truth.

When the president said he needed loyalty, "I didn’t move, speak or change my facial expression in any way during the awkward silence that followed. We simply looked at each other in silence," Comey said.

At one point, Comey’s testimony said, he explained why it was important that the FBI and Department of Justice be independent of the White House. But the president raised the loyalty issue again near the end of the dinner, saying "I need loyalty," according to the prepared remarks.

Comey said he replied, "You will always get honesty from me." Trump responded, "That’s what I want, honest loyalty."

The Oval Office meeting occurred on Feb. 14 after a counterterrorism briefing, Comey said in the remarks. Trump said he wanted to speak to Comey alone. Attorney General Jeff Sessions and adviser Jared Kushner lingered, Comey said, but the president said he wanted to speak only to Comey.

Trump said Flynn had done nothing wrong by speaking to the Russians. But Trump had to let him go because he misled the vice president. "He is a good guy and has been through a lot," Trump reportedly said. "I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go."

Comey said he replied only that Flynn "is a good guy."

Comey said he understood the president to be requesting that the FBI drop any investigation into alleged false statements Flynn made about his conversations with the Russians. "I did not understand the president to be talking about the broader investigation into Russia or possible links to his campaign," Comey said.

In a March 30 phone call, Trump told Comey that the Russia probe was a "cloud" hanging over his ability to lead the country, according to Comey’s account. Trump reportedly said he had nothing to do with Russia and had not been involved with hookers there. Trump reportedly said it would be good to find out if "satellite" associates of his had done something wrong. But he hadn’t done anything wrong, and he hoped Comey could get out that information.

"I responded that we were investigating the matter as quickly as we could," Comey said, "and that there would be great benefit, if we didn’t find anything, to our having done the work well. He agreed, but then re-emphasized the problems this was causing him."

Trump finished the conversation by stressing that the cloud was interfering with his ability to make deals for the country, and he hoped Comey could find a way to let people know he wasn’t being investigated. "I told him I would see what we could do, and that we would do our investigative work well and as quickly as we could," Comey said.

Comey said he first assured Trump he was not under investigation during a Jan. 6 briefing. Trump raised the issue at the January dinner and said he was considering ordering Comey to investigate salacious, unverified allegations involving Trump and Russia to prove the incident didn’t happen, according to Comey.

Comey said he replied that the idea should be given careful thought because it might create a narrative that the FBI was investigating the president personally, which it wasn’t, and because it is difficult to prove a negative. Read online

Monday, April 3, 2017

President Trump’s Listening Session on Healthcare



Remarks by President Trump in a Listening Session on Healthcare
The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
March 13, 2017


Roosevelt Room
11:27 A.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT:  Thank you all for being here today.  It’s a great honor for you to share your personal stories of struggle under the enormous strain imposed on you by the very, very failed and failing Obamacare law.  Secretary Price and I, along with my entire administration, and a lot of people in the Senate and a lot of people in the House are committed to repealing and replacing this disastrous law with a healthcare plan that lowers cost, expands choice, and ensures access for everyone. 

You represent the millions of Americans who have seen their Obamacare premiums increase by double digits and even triple digits.  In Arizona, the rates were over 116 percent last year -- 116 percent increase.  And the deductibles are so high you don’t even get to use it.

Many Americans lost their plans and doctors altogether, and one-third of the counties -- think of it, one-third only have one insurer left.  The insurance companies are fleeing.  They’re gone; so many gone.  The House bill to repeal and replace Obamacare will provide you and your fellow citizens with more choices -- far more choices at lower cost.  Americans should pick the plan they want.  Now they’ll be able to pick the plan they want, they’ll be able to pick the doctor they want.  They’ll be able to do a lot of things that the other plan was supposed to give and it never gave.  You don’t pick your doctor, you don’t pick your plan -- you remember that one.

We’re not going to have one-size-fits-all.  Instead, we’re going to be working to unleash the power of the private marketplace to let insurers come in and compete for your business.  And you’ll see rates go down, down, down, and you’ll see plans go up, up, up.  You’ll have a lot of choices. Read more

 Healthcare - Justice Network link



The business case for single payer
Fix It Healthcare.com

Business owner Richard Master knows firsthand how the dysfunctional U.S. health care system punishes not only patients, but also employers who are forced to spend more and more to insure their workers. His documentary, "Fix It," makes a strong business case for addressing this festering problem, and includes interviews with many PNHP members. A trailer for the film can be accessed above, or you can view the full version for free by visiting the "Fix It" website. Read more

Fix It Healthcare - Get Active HERE!
Fix It Healthcare - Watch the Movie
Fix It Healthcare brochure booklet PDF
Fix It Healthcare tri fold brochure PDF



Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP) is a non-profit research and education organization of 20,000 physicians, medical students and health professionals who support single-payer national health insurance. PNHP reports Analysis of HR 676: Medicare for All would save billions, Physicians for a National Health Program, by Gerald Friedman, Ph.D.

Expanded & Improved Medicare for All Act
Introduced in House (01/24/2017)
Sponsor: Rep. John Conyers Jr. (D)



Taylor Swift - Shake It Off Live - Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, Wikipedia link. The Lady Cilento Children's Hospital (LCCH) is the major specialist children's hospital for Queensland and New South Wales, Australia families. Official website
_________________________________________________________________

On Health Care, We’ll Have What Congress Is Having

The New Yorker
By Jeffrey Frank 
January 17, 2017


In the fall of 1994, the Clinton Administration’s much debated comprehensive, and complicated, health-insurance bill—known derisively as Hillarycare—died quietly on Capitol Hill. It was a moment that, the Princeton sociologist Paul Starr later argued, would "go down as one of the great lost political opportunities in American history." But, before the end, talk of another approach kept bubbling up: to allow those Americans who couldn’t get insurance elsewhere to buy a policy that was just as good, and inexpensive, as what members of Congress got. When Senator Edward M. Kennedy, of Massachusetts, said that Americans should get "exactly what we have," he meant the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.

The F.E.H.B.P., as it’s known, was started in 1959, a few years before Medicare, and was meant to cover some nine million government employees—civil-service workers, the courts, the Post Office, members of Congress, and more. It wasn’t a single plan but, rather, as a Times story put it, "a supermarket offering 300 private health plans." (Even the right-learning Heritage Foundation called it "a showcase of consumer choice and free-market competition.") One may get a sense of its scope and inclusiveness—its supermarket-ness—in the way that the Office of Personnel Management, which administers the program, explains it to federal employees. Much of the program—for instance, the idea that no one can be refused, or charged more, for a preëxisting condition, or that dependents under twenty-six are covered—will sound familiar to anyone conversant with the most attractive parts of the Affordable Care Act. Read more