Showing posts with label investigation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label investigation. Show all posts

Saturday, June 17, 2017

Trump appears to confirm he is being investigated for firing Comey in new 'witch hunt' tweet

President Trump
Trump appears to confirm he is being investigated for firing Comey in new 'witch hunt' tweet
American Bar Association (ABA)
By Debra Cassens Weiss
Posted Jun 16, 2017 09:04 am CDT


Updated: President Donald Trump apparently confirmed he is under investigation for firing FBI director James Comey in an early morning tweet.

The tweet read: "I am being investigated for firing the FBI Director by the man who told me to fire the FBI Director! Witch Hunt."

Trump was likely referring to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, according to several media reports, including stories by the New York Times, the Hill and Politico.

Some commentators, however, said Trump could be referring to special counsel Robert Mueller. Rosenstein appointed Mueller following the recusal of Attorney General Jeff Sessions in the FBI’s probe of Russian influence.

Trump’s tweet could force Rosenstein’s recusal in the Mueller investigation, according to a Bloomberg View article by Harvard law professor Noah Feldman.

If Mueller is investigating Trump’s firing of Comey as possible obstruction of justice, he might want to learn about Trump’s interactions with Rosenstein, the Justice Department official who wrote the memo criticizing Comey’s performance before his firing.

That would mean Rosenstein is a potential witness in the investigation he is overseeing, a point made by Politico in a May 31 article.

Trump’s tweet deepens the potential conflict by asserting that Comey’s firing was Rosenstein’s idea, Feldman says.

If Rosenstein recuses himself, supervision of the Mueller probe would be left to Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand, a Harvard law graduate who clerked for Justice Anthony M. Kennedy and ran the Office of Legal Policy at the Justice Department.

"She’s a horse of a different color from career prosecutors such as Rosenstein, Comey and Mueller," Feldman writes. "Her attitude toward the investigation is likely to be a bit different from Rosenstein’s, more informed by the structure of presidential authority and less by unwritten norms of prosecutorial independence."

The Times points out that Trump’s tweet came hours after an "oddly worded" statement by Rosenstein about leaks.

Rosenstein’s statement read: "Americans should exercise caution before accepting as true any stories attributed to anonymous ‘officials,’ particularly when they do not identify the country—let alone the branch or agency of government—with which the alleged sources supposedly are affiliated."

The Washington Post reported on Wednesday that Mueller is investigating possible obstruction of justice by Trump. According to the Post, both Comey and Daniel Coats, director of national Intelligence, have said Trump sought their help in hopes the FBI would drop the investigation of former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

The Post’s information on Coats is based on anonymous sources who claimed Trump asked Coats whether he could ask Comey to back off the FBI’s focus on Flynn. Coats reportedly said he didn’t feel pressured however.

Comey’s claim was aired in public congressional testimony on June 8. He testified that, about three months before his firing, Trump pressed him to drop the investigation of Flynn by saying he hoped Comey could let it go. Read more
I am being investigated for firing the FBI Director by the man who told me to fire the FBI Director! Witch Hunt
    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump)
June 16, 2017
Updated at 12:25 p.m. to include information from Bloomberg View article and at 12:40 to correct typos.

Thursday, June 15, 2017

Trump says he is '100 percent' willing to testify about Comey meetings

President Donald Trump
Trump says he is '100 percent' willing to testify about Comey meetings
American Bar Association (ABA)
By Debra Cassens Weiss
Posted Jun 09, 2017 04:02 pm CDT

President Donald Trump told reporters on Friday that he never asked James Comey to pledge his loyalty, and never told Comey to consider dropping the investigation into former national security adviser Michael Flynn’s ties to Russian officials.

Trump said he was "100 percent" willing to testify about his conversations with the former FBI director, report the New York Times, CNN, the Wall Street Journal (sub. req.) ABC, The Associated Press and CBS.

Trump promised to reveal "in the very near future" whether he had taped his conversations with Comey, and said journalists would be "disappointed when you hear the answer."

Trump stated in a May 12 tweet that, "James Comey better hope that there are no ‘tapes’ of our conversations before he starts leaking to the press!" Trump had fired Comey three days earlier.

Comey had told the Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday that he hoped there were tapes to verify his version of events.

Comey had told the committee that Trump told him in a Feb. 14 meeting that Flynn was "a good guy" and he hadn’t done anything wrong in calls with the Russians. "I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go," Trump allegedly said. "He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go."

But Trump denied making that statement when questioned by reporters.

"I didn’t say that. I will tell you I didn’t say that," Trump said. "And there would be nothing wrong if I did say it, according to everything I’ve read today."

Comey had also described a Jan. 27 dinner in which Trump reportedly said to him, "I need loyalty, I expect loyalty."

But Trump also denied that.

"I hardly know the man. I’m not going to say, ‘I want you to pledge allegiance,’" Trump said. "It hardly makes sense."

Trump’s denial echoed a statement released later on Thursday by Trump’s personal lawyer, Marc Kasowitz. Yet Trump and Kasowitz both said part of Comey’s testimony had benefited the president, showing Trump was not being investigated for colluding with the Russians. And they both said the testimony demonstrated Trump had not obstructed justice. Read more