Thursday, November 17, 2016

How a Trump election challenge could play out

How a Trump election challenge could play out
ABA Journal Daily News
By Debra Cassens Weiss
Posted Oct 24, 2016 08:00 am CDT

A challenge to election results by Donald Trump could start and ultimately end in the states.

State laws governing recounts vary, CNN reports in an article by University of Texas law professor Steve Vladeck. Issues include when a candidate can request a recount and when the recount is required.

Some states require an automatic recount when results are close. And some states don’t allow recounts unless the vote is close, report Politico, the New York Times and the Boston Herald. Some states allow recounts when there is a larger margin separating the candidates but require the candidate to pay the cost.

Trump could challenge the recount results. He could also sue state officials for allegedly violating their own election procedures. And he could claim voter fraud changed the results.

Larry Noble, former general counsel of the Federal Election Commission, pointed out that Trump can’t rely on general allegations of fraud to make his case. "You need something more specific," he told the Boston Herald. "You need a serious claim."

Federal law guarantees recognition of a state’s electors only if the results are certified within 35 days, giving the states five weeks to resolve challenges, according to the CNN article. A longer resolution could run the risk that Congress wouldn’t recognize state results and would instead make its own decision on the state winner.

Trump could try to persuade electors meeting in December to ignore the state vote, or he could ask state lawmakers to appoint new electors, University of California law professor Richard Hasen tells the Times.

Congress meets to count electoral votes Jan. 6. If no candidate receives a majority, each state casts a vote to determine the winner. Trump could also ask Congress not to recognize a state vote or to challenge a state’s counting procedure, Hasen said.

Disputes over election results are resolved under state law unless a federal constitutional violation can be shown. That was the issue in Bush v. Gore, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 on behalf of George W. Bush, finding an equal protection clause violation.

What happens if a constitutional case goes to the U.S. Supreme Court? If the court splits 4-4, the state supreme court opinion would be affirmed, CNN reports in a different story.

Another scenario would be a recusal by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg because of her comments criticizing Trump as "a faker" with "an ego" who "says whatever comes into his head at the moment." New York University law professor Stephen Gillers told CNN in July that he thinks Ginsburg would be required to recuse because her impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

But it would be up to Ginsburg to decide whether to recuse. Read more

Revised at 9:50 a.m. to correct wrong reference in the second to last paragraph.

Justice Network 2016 Election
Justice Network 2016 Election Rules

Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, Wikipedia

Federal Election Commission (FEC)
FEC 2016 Candidate Summary

Florida Division of Elections
Candidate Tracking System database

Florida election law is governed by the Florida Statutes
Title IX, Electors and Elections, Chapters 97-107

Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000), Wikipedia
Bush v. Gore (2000), PBS
Bush v. Gore (00-949), Cornell University

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.